Authenticity (not getting caught up in performance to where you lose the plot on your own feelings/preferences)
— Ann Pierce (@itsannpierce) August 15, 2025
+
Duty (transcending day-to-day emotional weather to show up for something greater)
= Loving yourself and others (a tension, a balancing act, a seesaw)
If you are developmentally in Kegan Stage 2, you won’t care much about authenticity. People in Stage 2 are primarily concerned with getting what they want. If they can get what they want by saying something untrue, and there is no punishment for doing this, they will do it.
Stage 3 is where authenticity becomes a concern, because it is a central building block of connection and trust. People in Stage 3 base their entire identity on being in the good graces of their ingroup. This isn’t a choice they make consciously, because they are usually not aware it’s happening. It’s just that when their connection to the ingroup is threatened, it feels indistinguishable from a threat against their personal existence. Therefore, behaviors that foster connection feel right and good and behaviors that create separation feel wrong and bad.
In contrast, when in Kegan Stage 4, people can have relationships rather than be them. So a Kegan 4 can make decisions about what is right or good based on their own exploration and values (this is where their sense of self now lies). And these values can be maintained over time, rather than just in the moment. As a consequence, Kegan 4s will still value connection and trust-building, but when in relationships or groups, Stage 4s can maintain the boundary between “me” and “other” and be in choice about how they are influenced.
Through the power of this separation, Stage 4s are now able to consciously and intentionally play roles. So rather than just “being themselves” - which in 4 patterning means to act in line with their personal values, or in 3 patterning means to act automatically/unconsciously - they can decidedly put some of their personality aside to do what a situation calls for, in service of a grander goal.
For example, they might consciously choose to:
- Treat outgroups warmly in order to gain their political cooperation
- Follow rigid procedures that conflict with their personal desires and whims in order to keep product quality consistent
- Trump beloved others’ wishes in order to prioritize time effectively
Duty is at least somewhat understood by stages 2 and above, if naively. But how one realistically is able to carry out duty across time might be called "professionalism." And I will continue to define this as “acting in the way a situation calls for, in service of a grander goal.”
Professionalism feels evil to Kegan Stage 3s. That's because, to them, it feels like meeting others with lying, manipulation, trickery. Professionalism registers as in direct opposition to their definition of authenticity, which is to act automatically, unconsciously, without hidden agenda.
Kegan Stage 4s also struggle to reconcile professionalism with authenticity but in a different way. That's because, to them, professionalism feels like stuffing themselves down or dehumanizing themselves. While they are sometimes happy to trump their own short-term self’s desires in favor of their own long-term ones, following someone else’s judgment instead of their own feels like self-betrayal. This registers in direct opposition to their definition of authenticity - which is to act in line with their personal values.
As a result of these struggles, Stage 3s will frequently fail to advance in the career realm, where a different kind of trust - the predictability of systems over feelings - is expected. Their attempts at organizational efforts will spiral into chaos. Likewise, many enthusiastic Kegan 4s will launch their own projects but struggle to collaborate effectively with others. The only map they're comfortable following is the one they've constructed themselves.
Notably, there are downsides to the Kegan 3 definition of authenticity, even if you look past its difficulty with professionalism. Because Kegan 3 equates intentionality or agenda with inauthenticity, the process of thinking about thinking (known as metacognition) gets automatically bucketed as inauthentic and therefore bad. In Stage 4, where metacognition is highly valued, a person might notice unskillfulness in himself and consciously try to correct it in future situations. But without metacognition, and with a mandate to be an open book to other people, and the insane expectation to never ever disappoint the ingroup, there is no healthy path for dealing with one's own flaws. So instead, they can only calcify into a toxic shame that gets hidden away even from one's own awareness. This wreaks havoc that many people spend the rest of their lives cleaning up after.
On the Kegan 4 side, authenticity that relies on personal values has more problems too. Stage 4s frequently struggle with reconciling their short and long-term values. When they serve only short-term values, their accomplishments are smaller-scaled than their ambitions. When they serve only long-term values, they feel burned out and lost. The cognitive overload and resulting distress from overriding their in-the-moment feelings and intuitions over and over again can feel like physical pain. Likewise, one could make something they’re incredibly proud of, then their values change, and they become terribly embarrassment of what they once did. This all often spirals into procrastination and self-doubt.
These problems are hard to manage! If we look in the Kegan framework, though, we find a 5-patterned answer: to see the limits of any one system-of-being and to learn to code-switch accordingly. In other words, if one becomes flexible enough with their definition of authenticity to make different choices at different times, to diversify their strategy to meet different needs, they might be able to balance their energy, collaborate with others, and achieve both small and large goals.